12 Comments
Sep 22Liked by Dr Piers Robinson

Didn’t Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth have almost 4000 signatures of professional people before they where split-up.

Reading their evidence seemed overwhelming to me. The free fall and melted steel.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xWi0x9xigQM&pp=ygUlcmljaGFyZCBnYWdlIGFyY2hpdGVjdHMgYW5kIGVuZ2luZWVycw%3D%3D

I also don’t think that anyone should forget that fact that George W Bush asked Richard Alan Clarke to lie about 9/11, say it was Saddam Hussein that the caused of 9/11.

Now we Have Iraq asking the US to leave, and we have the US saying in two year, long enough to over throw the government in Iraq, again.

By now it should be a know fact that on 9/11, it was our own US government who were the terrorist on that day, that and perhaps along with Mossad. Seems like someone should be investigating the trouble with the exploding pagers, phones, hand held radios in Mideast.

Have to wonder if there is Thermitic Pyrotechnics left in samples of exploding pagers in Lebanon? Someone should check that I guess.

Expand full comment
author

Yes AE9/11 have done excellent work,

Expand full comment
Sep 22Liked by Dr Piers Robinson

Thank you for sharing this article!

Expand full comment

(Quote)

"Finally, the framework presented here can be used in order to develop a template for detecting SDEs in real-time and helping analysts to rapidly gather evidence: As noted earlier, SDEs are a subset of crimes against democracy (CADs), and such real-time monitoring might considerably increase the possibility of there being legal accountability for these crimes."

----------

Anyone successfully developing such a diagnostic algorithm (and CERTAINLY anyone who used such tools effectively) to stymie those capable of operations at the observed scale would quickly be found to traffic in child pornography or otherwise end up in a psychiatric hospital, prison cell or pine box.

In the meantime, perhaps ask Martin Armstrong to look into it...

Expand full comment
author

Perhaps, but I don't believe 'they' are all powerful. but I know what you mean, p.

Expand full comment

Two quotes come to mind:

1) Larry Silverstein on video, owner of WTC buildings, with reference to building WTC7 “I told them to Pull it”. The building then collapsed as in a classic controlled demolition. He apparently made an enormous amount via insurance claims, themselves suspicious, and was involved in the rebuild.

2) Peter Daszak of Eco Health Alliance - often quoted by Dr David Martin, seen on

Dr Reiner Fuellmich’s ICIC interviews.

In 2015, Dr. Peter Daszak, head of the EcoHealth Alliance that funneled research dollars from the NIAID to the Wuhan Institute of Virology for coronavirus research, who has promoted the official narrative that SARS-CoV-2 has a natural origin, stated:

"We need to increase public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures such as a pan-coronavirus vaccine.

A key driver is the media and the economics will follow the hype.

We need to use that hype to our advantage, to get to the real issues.

Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process."

Reiner himself has been in jail in Germany for I think 11 months - one can only wonder as to the real reason why…

https://auf1.tv/international-auf1/jail-for-11-months-what-is-the-system-doing-to-reiner-fuellmich?mc_cid=7d8b6dcd76&mc_eid=d33eeaf0dc

Expand full comment
author

thanks for this info, p.

Expand full comment
Sep 22Liked by Dr Piers Robinson

Elsa on Substack has been posting regularly about Reiner Fuellmich’s 🦘 trial in Germany. It’s just appalling!

https://substack.com/@elsaiselsa?r=1l8jg4&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=profile

Expand full comment

The ones implementing these CADS on behalf of the controllers are probably doing so because the controllers have got various evidence of filth on them.

Expand full comment
Oct 19·edited Oct 19

I am pleased to have found your substack, Piers. I shall read with interest.

Meanwhile, are the readers of this website aware that temporary powers of entry and detention under the coronavirus act have already been made permanent in Scotland in 2022 without any publicity?

On its face, the Bill would permit forced entry into individuals’ homes and then vaccination by force if deemed necessary for public health.

The legislation would remove civil rights with respect to bodily autonomy, property rights, parental rights, possession rights including animals, the freedom to associate and the right to work as well as introducing a surveillance regime.

It is extremely concerning that mainstream media has been largely silent on these proposals. It is also of concern that this may be intended to be – or may by default become – a trial run of how such legislation is received by the population in a small part of the UK before being rolled out to the rest of the country.

Similar proposals are now going through the Northern Ireland assembly and no doubt these powers will be “harmonised” in England.

The Department of Health in Northern Ireland has published a document setting out proposals for a new Health Bill.

https://mydup.com/news/dup-publish-public-health-bill-consultation-response

Holyrood votes to pass legislation on emergency coronavirus powers. June 2022

MSPs have voted to pass legislation allowing some emergency coronavirus powers to become permanent, despite opposition parties labelling it a “power-grab”.

The Coronavirus Recovery and Reform Bill was passed at Holyrood by 66 votes to 52 on Tuesday night.

https://news.stv.tv/scotland/msps-vote-to-pass-legislation-on-emergency-covid-powers-which-will-give-scottish-government-ability-to-impose-lockdowns

Similar powers are being granted by parliaments in Canada and Australia.

https://www.parl.ca/LegisInfo/en/bill/44-1/C-293

A totalitarian system is being implemented in the guise of a fabricated “health emergency” throughout all “western” democracies.

Expand full comment

https://stephenmcmurray.substack.com/p/my-letter-to-mlas-regarding-the-proposed

“I am writing to you to convey my grave concerns over the proposed new health bill that is currently out for consultation. It is draconian in the extreme. Under this proposed bill, a member of the Public Health Agency could enter one’s premises by force, physically restrain or assault the owner, remove whatever items from their premises they choose, forcibly vaccinate the owner and quarantine them for 28 days.

This period could, after going via a magistrate, be extended for further periods of 28 days indefinitely.

Not only that but it doesn’t even have to be a Public Health Agency official. They can designate anyone they choose to enter one’s premises, so could, in theory, hire security guards or bouncers to intimidate or harass the owner.

Moreover, because under this proposal animals are deemed to be ‘things’, one’s pets can be ‘destroyed or disposed of.’ Apart from the fact that this directly contradicts the new Animal Abduction act, which recognises animals as sentient creatures, it is abhorrent. To list animals in the same category as human tissue or human remains is disgusting.

The most disturbing part of this bill is the proposal for mandatory vaccination. This a breach of the most fundamental right of all, the right to bodily autonomy. This right is inalienable. It is not granted by government and therefore cannot be removed by anyone, no matter who they are. Apart from being totally unethical it is unlawful. Moreover, the concept of consent was considered fundamental when creating the Nuremburg code and any proposal to ignore that would be a breach of that code.

See United States of America v. Karl Brandt, et al.

According to the human rights lawyer, Anne de Buisseret, mandatory vaccination is ‘wholly illegal, unlawful, immoral and unethical.’

One would have thought that the Assembly would have learned from devastating health consequences caused by the disastrous lockdown policy inflicted on Northern Ireland citizens but apparently not. Instead, the Health department are proposing the most sinister, Orwellian bill imaginable

Expand full comment

Thanks for this template for analyzing such perception-shifting events. I'd add a few more for analysis such as the, 1. "moon landings" of 1969-1972, 2. insertion of "Barak Obama" into 2008 presidential election 3. Creation of ww1 4. Creation of ww2 with emphasis on the ensuing emphasis on "Hitler" & "holocaust" ubiquitous narrative & censoring by law in Germany any alternative investigation. 5. "Global warming/Climate change."

Probably all wars could benefit from such analysis as it must be clear by now that they are deeply rooted in & profoundly affect economy, social coherence, perceptions of reality & meaning.

Expand full comment