9/11, Justice and the Campbell Family

In January 2024, for the second time, the British Attorney General (AG) has refused a request from the Campbell family for a fresh inquest into the death of Geoff Campbell who was killed on 9/11. They are now urgently trying to raise the financial support necessary to take on the AG and you can support them here.

Geoff Campbell with fiancée in 2001.

This should not have been a complicated decision for the AG. On the grounds that the first inquest was tarnished by ‘insufficiency of inquiry’, coupled with the subsequent emergence of new evidence in recent years, the Campbell family has every right under British law to demand a fresh inquest.

However, when confronted with substantial scientific and material evidence confirming the official 9/11 story is false, the AG simply chose to defer to the long-debunked official reports: The 9/11 Commission Report and the NIST (National Standards in Science and Technology) reports into the destruction of WTC1, 2 and 7. Extraordinarily, based upon these official reports, the AG declared there to be a ‘clear consensus view’ the official story is true and that, based on a ‘common-sense view’, the hypothesis that 9/11 was carried out by actors other than al-Qaeda is ‘fanciful’. No substantial investigation was necessary for the AG to reach this conclusion:

Excerpt from AG Letter to Campbell Family, January 2024

In fact, if he had cared to look, the AG would have seen that there is a wealth of evidence, now well established, which fundamentally undermines this purported ‘consensus’.

All of the official reports have been shown to be flawed. The 9/11 Commission itself was not independent of the US government with its executive director, Philip Zelikow, having served on President G.W. Bush’s transition team and the President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board (PFIAB). The resulting 9/11 Commission Report was described by Griffin as containing substantive ‘omissions and distortions’ (2004). The NIST investigations have been countered now by multiple studies, including the early work on WTC dust samples by Harrit et al (2009) and the AE9/11 funded study by the University of Alaska Fairbanks (Hulsey, Quan and Xiao (2020). The former identified evidence for explosive material within the dust samples whilst the latter found that the symmetrical free fall collapse of WTC7 could only have occurred if all 58 supporting columns were removed simultaneously. Recent work published in the Journal of 9/11 Studies includes a critical evaluation of the plausibility of the original collapse mechanism theorised to explain the complete destruction of the Twin Towers. Here the crush-down theory, which hypothesised that the top section of each tower crushed the building structure below in totality, is incompatible with the observation that large sections of the inner core remained standing for some time (Cole, 2023).

Taken together, the quantity of research now completed demonstrates the implausibility of official claims revolving around the idea that it was the damage caused by the impact of two airliners that lead to the collapses of the two buildings hit (WTC 1 and 2) and then of a third (WTC7) that was not (Griffin and Woodworth, 2018). Overall, the evidence regarding 9/11, and the reality that it was a ‘manufactured war trigger’, is overwhelming and a good place to start for those of you unfamiliar it is the International Center for 9/11 Justice and the affiliated Journal of 9/11 Studies.

Unfortunately, the British AG’s Orwellian mindset directs us to ignore all such evidence and, instead, defer to the voices of authority. This is not justice for the Campbell family, and it is not the truth about 9/11 that our societies ever so badly need. Indeed, this legal case concerns much more than the right of one family to seek redress for the loss of a loved one. It concerns getting to the bottom of an egregious deception, perpetrated by those who rule over us, and which has led to a generation of perpetual war in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yemen and now Ukraine and Gaza.

War planning memo from British Prime Minister Tony Blair to US President George W. Bush, Autumn 2001.

We are now on the cusp of, potentially at least, even greater conflict with Russia and China. If the powers that be were willing to murder our brethren on 9/11 in order to start the campaign of ‘regime-change’ wars', they are also willing to send your sons and daughters to die in new wars. It is time to set the truth free, and in doing so end this nightmarish and Orwellian phase in the history of the West and of the world.

If you can, please provide support to the Campbell family here. And you can watch below Geoff’s brother, Matt Campbell, being interview by Clayton Morris regarding their battle for justice.

Thank you,

Dr Piers Robinson, Research Director, International Center for 9/11 Justice

References

Cole, Jonathan. (2023), ‘Discussion of “Spontaneous Collapse Mechanism of World Trade Center Twin Towers and Progressive Collapse in General” by Jia-Liang Le and Zdeněk P. Bažant’, Journal of 9/11 Studies, vol: 43.

Griffin, David Ray. (2004), The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions (Olive Branch Press).

Harrit, Niels, H., Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley and Bradley R. Larsen. (2009), ‘Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe’, Bentham Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2, pp: 7-31.

Hulsey, L., Zhili Quan and Feng Xiao. (2020) ‘A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Centre 7, Final Report’. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alaska Fairbanks.

Griffin, David, Ray., and Elizabeth Woodworth, (2018), 9/11 Unmasked: An International Review Panel Investigation, (Olive Branch Press). See also https://ic911.org/consensus-panel/.